About the OCULA Spring Conference

What are the boundaries of academic and intellectual freedom within academic institutions, particularly in this socio-political moment? How does the academic library as a memory institution claim neutrality while also acting as the authority on which technologies, information, and resources should or should not be prioritized, protected, and shared? What is the academic library worker’s relationship with authority and positional power, and how can we use our roles to enact institutional, sectoral, and social change? Making sense of some of our sector’s biggest questions can only be addressed together. Join us for a day of ideas, grassroots conversations, and dynamic presentations from folks who have spent their careers reflecting on these questions. 

Agenda

time icon 07 May 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM

Opening Keynote: Beavers in the Library: How Do We Let Go of Power and Build Intergenerational Diplomacy?

Andrew Wiebe

Faculty of Information, University of Toronto

Andrew Wiebe (he/them) is an Indigi-Queer (Red River Michif) PhD Candidate at the Faculty of Information at the University of Toronto. His PhD project, Lii Lozh di Kaastor (The Beaver Lodge), is a co-created archival project that involves the creation of an interactive digital atlas of queer knowledge with Two-Spirit Elders, Knowledge Keepers, and Scholars on Turtle Island. The corresponding thesis is a guide and example of how to build Indigenous and Queer stories into traditional archival practice through a methodology inspired by our relationship with beavers—tearing down trees and rebuilding the environment. This metaphor of the beaver is used to think through how to build relationally, taking into account the environmental requirements while imagining a future that is enriched with environmental regeneration, even in this online environment. This envisioned future is one that weaves together Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Western archival practice.

The talk focuses on the generational elements of library environments—thinking through relational practices and power relationships embedded within library systems. Some key questions that are raised involve asking, “why do we do things the way that we do them, when we choose the system? Why are so attached to our hierarchies? What I propose is a forward looking vision of librarianship in which we challenge hierarchies in a generative and collaborative way—honouring relational practices. 

time icon 07 May 11:15 AM to 12:00 PM

Seeking Solidarity: Challenging the Binary of the Librarian / Staff Divide

Monica Rettig

Brock University

Monica is the Head of User Services & Engagement at Brock University. Currently on sabbatical, she is interested in feminist philosophy and workplace practices, and Wikipedia writing. She can also be found in a hockey arena cheering for her three kids on ice, walking her dog Molly, or reading.

Alicia Floyd

Brock University

Alicia began her professional journey as an archivist at a museum—preserving local history one artifact at a time. In 2007, she took a bold and exhilarating leap into the academic library world, where she became captivated by its dynamic energy, the constant hum of curiosity, and the brilliant minds she now calls colleagues. She is deeply passionate about equitable leadership and champions a student-centered approach in her role overseeing the access services department at Brock University Library.

Beyond the bookshelves, she is a devoted dog enthusiast and proud mother of two remarkable young men. She adores a well-worn print book, and finds nothing better than embracing the quiet magic of forest adventures or a quiet boat ride on Lake Erie with her husband and four-legged companion.

We invite attendees to critically reflect on the library’s internal power dynamics and consider: How do you understand the ‘librarian/ staff divide’? Co-presenters Alicia (staff) and Monica (librarian) will share insights from the literature alongside personal observations. By historicizing the professionalizing of librarianship, we can better reckon with the ‘zero sum game’ fallacy which pits Us versus Them. Organized labour and feminism have the goal of a more just society for all: We argue that reinforcing the workplace binary undermines solidarity while working against shared values. Three topics which reveal this tension include work-from-home, the impact of AI, and decision-making bodies.

time icon 07 May 01:00 PM to 01:30 PM

Wrestling with Alternative Truths: The Case of Evidence-Based Activism

David Gerstle

University of Toronto Mississauga

David Gerstle is Research Services and Liaison Librarian at University of Toronto Mississauga Library. He provides information fluency education and support for evidence syntheses in intersections of the Social and Health Sciences, many of which focus on the social, political, and economic determinants of health for under-served Canadian populations. He is the UTM Library supporting librarian for the university’s partnership with the Novo Nordisk Network for Healthy Populations, an initiative working toward interventions in chronic illness and facilitation of health access and equity in the Peel Region.

Evidence-Based Activism (EBA) challenges professional discourses on disease, disability, and therapy. Activists are self-educated in medical knowledge, forming communities that confront what they see as inequitable treatment or misinformed understandings of their conditions. They attempt to augment medical evidence, arguing that their lived experiences (‘experiential expertise’) be valued as much as clinical trials. For librarians, supporting users who challenge authoritative information creates tensions between the expert knowledge we advocate for and the rights of our users to reject it, even asking for our assistance in creating alternatives to commonly accepted practices. I use the literature on EBA and patient organizations who counter expert information to think through possibilities of professional neutrality and how we accommodate authority in relation to our users’ needs.

time icon 07 May 01:35 PM to 02:35 PM

Reclaiming "the Political" in the Workplace: An Invitation to Build Transnational Labour Solidarity Across Academic Library Worker Groups

Alex Jiyun Jung

University of Toronto

Alex works as Open Knowledge Specialist at the University of Toronto Libraries. He is an engaged unionist in CUPE Local 1230 and a long-time community organiser. In library work, he helps people edit, learn/teach with, and observe limits to open knowledge tools like Wikipedia.

As our institutions buckle under aggressive attacks on public education and institutional investments in racial capitalism, we are reminded that our collectively won working conditions and policy environments determine how free we are to demand better at the workplace for ourselves and our communities. Join us to think through the work(!) of building broad-based labour resistance in academic libraries!

time icon 07 May 02:50 PM to 03:20 PM

DEI in Academic Librarian Job Postings: Are We Doing Enough?

Rochelle David

University of Toronto

Rochelle David is a Toronto Academic Library Intern (TALint) at the University of Toronto Engineering and Computer Science Library and a Graduate Student Library Assistant (GSLA) at the Ontario Institute for Studies In Education (OISE) library. Rochelle’s research interests surround the experiences of racialized staff and students in the academic library environment, as well as policy development and decision-making in libraries and government.

Mona Makinejad

University of Toronto

Mona Makinejad (she/her) recently completed her Master's of Information at the University of Toronto. She is interested in issues of diversity, equity, inclusion, and sustainability in librarianship and collections.

This presentation will be based on a research paper that we wrote, in which we conducted an environmental scan of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) statements and language in job postings at academic libraries in the United States. In this session we will uncover our findings, discuss how the language of job postings isn't as neutral as they seem, and the affects this language can have on the applicant pool and thus the diversity of the institution and how this research can be applied to analyzing academic libraries in Canada. We hope that this presentation will contribute to scholarly and professional discourse around recruitment, hiring, and retention by showcasing how precariously intertwined librarianship is with politics, despite the industry policy of neutrality.   

time icon 07 May 03:20 PM to 04:00 PM

Neutrality, Intellectual Freedom, Academic Freedom: Navigating the Complex World of Academic Libraries

James Turk

Director, Centre for Free Expression / Toronto Metropolitan University

Jim is Director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University. Prior founding and leading CFE since 2015, Jim was Executive Director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers, previously having been an Associate Professor at the University of Toronto where he taught Canadian Studies. He has also held several senior positions in the Canadian trade union movement. In 2024, Jim was honoured by being named the first recipient of the Canadian Federation of Library Associations Intellectual Freedom Award for outstanding contributions to intellectual freedom in Canada.

As its role is to serve the academic and research needs of faculty, students, and staff of its university, the academic library is uniquely complex as is the position of the academic library workers within it. The talk will explore the intersection of the library’s commitment to intellectual freedom, the academic freedom of both the academic library workers and the university staff they serve, and the university’s structure of collegial governance -- all three of which are contested and in flux.